Mutual Interview with Marianne Shaneen, Part II
[[Note: We did not have time to actually deliver this exchange at the Zinc Bar. Marianne is in bold below, Nada in plain text. Marianne please post your stuff on your blog…!]]
Q: you emphasize poetry as a form of bodily excrescence, bodily discharge- the role of ‘the body’, your body, etc.- (relates of course to the above ‘hermaphroditism’ and ‘feminine’)- the body as erotic, the source of pleasure and discomfort, your body as site of perception/sensation, conceptualizing and linguistic filtering and creation, the relationship between sexuality and language.
Q: talk about ‘irritation as a form of pleasure’ (i’m probably misquoting you here) and to what extent and how that is one of the hubs of your work- the role of discomfort, disturbance, agitation, fury, kicking the podium, risk, contraryness, defiance, rule-breaking
(this is related to your ways of being and not being ‘procedural’ and ‘formal’, the langpo ‘tradition’, etc- but that’s only one aspect of what I’m talking about)
and /or…to what extent is poetry, or what fuels and generates your writing, reactive, a defiance. and, how within the writing process itself, it is a defiance, podium-kicking, in the sense of what you’ve said:
“Writing demands limits (do you know who am paraphrasing?) but that doesn’t mean that I don’t always perceive them as something to push against, needle, expand, stand up on (if they are walls), dismantle, prod, kick at, or huddle up against, sobbing inconsolably. What’s interesting to me about poetic language is the way it naturally fights, insofar as it gets irrational, its own limits.”
To address “body” and “sexuality” and writing, I’m going to read from an interview Tom Beckett did with me that was just published online in Jacket 24. That interview answers the question about limits more fully than I have here.
I have said in other contexts that the definite article preceding “body” [the body] strikes me as quite Cartesianly distancing and non-particularizing. It seems to me more accurate to say “my body” as in my individual Nada-casing, Nada-matter & Nada-sensorium or to simply say “body” as in “the feeling of body-ness.” Maybe what you mean is “sensation” or even… “sensationalism”? Because that’s what a body is in relation to what is not that body — a means of sensing, a great fleshy antenna, a corporeal mind. In carnation — a big red one, smelling slightly cloyingly of cinnamon. The seas incarnadine — of wasted bodies, punctured by ideology. How could body not be present in anyone’s work? Even an ectomorph has a body — and is defined, in some sense, by his body. There are some writers, it is true, who seem to be cut off at the neck, whose oeuvre hatches mainly from the part of their body that is between the temples — is “the” body a temple? — but that nevertheless is body.Body in relation to writing. Writing in relation to body. Not such a huge difference to me — organic metaphors, poems as “birth canals, negative vaginal space” or as what is born, coming out coated with meconium — (can you detect my fondness for a certain brand of highly gynecological “chick art” — still totally necessary to combat the centuries’ vestiges of men’s supercilious suppression, condemnation, and envy of women’s “bodiment”?). Bisexual — poem is also phallus springing up out of nowhere very excited, aroused by what’s around. Or let’s get away from the genitals, shall we? Poem is legs, moving around, exploring. Arms & hands, embracing, feeling up, or just working, getting things done. Little navel void hollow, remembrance of connection. That too. Poem is oversensitive nose, limpid eye, tongue for probing and tasting. Poem is labyrinthine ear — duh. Like a body, a body of work — poems — is *in essence* free — of the market system, I mean. Except both of these you have to pay to maintain. Free health care!
87 billion dollars. How to be other than angry? 87 billion. The clenched body in a state of embattledness: clenched energies. Menstrual blood leaks out… shit… urban environment… guy spreading legs too wide on train… touching my leg… ecch… guy talks to himself, bangs umbrella on floor… it’s sweaty… having to coexist among all these other bodies… poets… with their clenchings and muscular memories, all the pain and rage and fear and lasciviousness each of these beings carries at any moment. The body in dreams: dreamed the other night I wanted to have a baby but had to do it covertly, couldn’t ask Gary, so I needed to seek alternative methods — thought to use another poet guy as a donor, someone I’ve been arguing with in “real life”, who recently accused me, not entirely incorrectly, of using him “as a buttress for your own self-identity, as neo-romantic, humanist,”eroticist,” feminist, identifier with “younger writers,” spontaneously creative, whatever suits your fancy because it’s all so terribly inconsistent….” [yeah, well…] then considered a new cloning method that involved implanting whole or partial babies into the uterus… these babies were frozen. I went to get one but it turned out the frozen baby was only a head — someone asked me, after I had tried unsuccessfully to “implant” it, “did you warm it up first?” oh, I thought, and put it in the oven, but left it in too long — the baby head — it came out yellow, dried, with gnarled teeth (teeth?) grotesque as a mummy.
I apologize in advance for the neo-surrealist truism, but indeed, isn’t it true that the more you explore language, bodies, or dreams, the stranger and more complex they become? You begin to realize the connections between language, bodies, and dreams. All or nearly all people dream, and the site of their dreams is their bodies, which twitch in their dreams and even convulse in orgasms because their bodies and dreams and minds are filled with language (and problems), which in their dreams slips around in the murkiest kinds of ways. Only poetry can formally approximate (I say approximate because even though my poems are freaky and filled with wild imagery and combinations they are nowhere near as vivid and disturbing as my dreams) that slippery problematic dream language.
Language is cream.
Language is crisis.
In a poem called “Essay” in Swoon I describe “the gleeful intensity of opening to crisis”. Crisis, in addition to meaning “life-changing difficulty” is one of those weird French euphemisms for “orgasm,” like “petit mort.” When I write, I feel like I am opening to crisis, exactly as I do if I have fallen in love. Suddenly, there’s this whole new territory — terrifying, gleeful, and intense, as the words open out to and attract other words and I find myself somewhere totally unexpected, aiming for a hypnotic state of hilarious abandon.
more from “Essay”… “love is experienced/as among other things/ rubbing”
This is an echo of my poem “Nothing” in Foriegnn Bodie (p. 32), where
I originally said “Irritation is a form of pleasure.”
It’s true of course — think of irritation as simply friction, without which sex as we know it would not exist.
It’s just one step from friction (or conflict, which I say in Swoon is essential to romantic love) to fury. Here’s the whole poem:
Nothing
Nothing is as it was said —
not the man who I was so
beautiful and I said so whatNot the wing just out of the
chrysalis (gold dot), not the plastic
chonmage wig, not even the webOnly love has the fury to make peace
in all the layers of the onion
sprouting in a black palstic boxCats yowling together make the sun rise
and dogs bark, irritation
is a form of pleasureLike strong from a yogi’s nose, devotion
doesn’t pour from your ears — or throat —
diamond shapes from a revolving lampI’m not really here
except for the glowing red light
under my arm…
Even the quiet little poems I wrote in Japan tend to be furious:
an inky smell
feistiness
feeds onbanging my feet
on mother’s cold stained glass
thinking to break it.
I’m sure the fury is more primal than anything I can address here without having to pay you $85 for 50 minutes, but it comes from feeling
worthless trivial abandoned unappreciated powerless gratuitous unnecessary disposable ineffectual unappreciated unsupported and betrayed, not to mention in pain
on micro and macro levels. Is there anyone in here who can’t empathize with this? be honest. Sometimes I think my entire oeuvre can be summed up in the howl, “IT’S NOT FAIR>>>>” I don’t mean that in any “merely” personal way.
How to cope with those defeatist emotions? Rage is a survival mechanism, screaming infant big noise red in the face with protest: FEED ME. PAY ATTENTION TO ME. Here’s a poem from 1978, the middle of my adolescence (I was fourteen) which I apparently have not outgrown:
KICKS II
I just quit school
I scarred up my arm
Got too drunk
Lost that charmThe other night we trashed some cars
Set a bin on fire
I ripped up my bellbottoms
And sewed them up with wireI smoked a cigarette today
Got burnt out on speed
So sick of safety pins
What the hell do I needNo solution
No solution
Here’s a concrete poem also from 1978 that attempts a formal diagramming of extreme forces, positive and negative, positing a kind of equivalence. [sorry folks, I misplaced this one — if I find it I’ll put it up here.] Neither of these poems is very interesting to me, but not because of their concerns, which obviously reverberate throughout my work 25 years later, but because I hadn’t yet learned enough chops. An XBXB rhyme scheme fails to thrill. Now I hope I’ve learned how to make my writing seethe with the tension between its artificed plasticity, its repertoire of disguises, and its primal GRRR (if you’ll permit me a momentary McLurid voicing).
A kind of fury and defiance move through my first collection, “Lip” (1988) as in “Don’t give me none of your lip” — but with much more formal (and therefore emotional) complexity
What life the world hath still
Deliberate verandas, swimming feels
Delight to douse the splendor of the heat
And in the umbrage of your sexuality
I sing a tone, in some sense howl it.
Worst, a small passionate self.
Best, a thinking flower who is a virgin
but a favorite of hellDelicate viands, swimming feet
Delight to rouse the speaker from his seat
And in the umbrella of your eyelashes
A thing or two can, in some sense, be howled.
Firstly, a cold class-in-itself.
Second, an infant voyeur who is a version
of the sadist as well
I’ll read a little from Vicious Etudes (the angriest poem in V. Imp) and then I’ll stop answering this question.
VICIOUS ETUDES
I have an exaggerated sense of my own unimportance.
–Nada Gordoni HATE the avuncles
and their stinging
when the fiery concrete tower
rises in the head and
i’m appropo of nothing
standing at the edge
of the hissing stage
and missing far apart
from spiritual dignity.the narcissi in my arms
smell like rotten breath,
nervous sweat, underwire
undercutting the man in me
with cheap, cloying, adolescent
powder. come here, i wantto alienate you. dyssemia
the volatile prosody i auto-eroticize
with (chick art ) in full view of the panel
of droning authorities in their
“moderation”: they (pea-green)
reduce awareness. stand clear
of the closing mind
of the eternally jerking emotional knee.
the hairshirt pink, frilly, jagged,
dissonant as lava flying up
“more sensitively”
from the dead moon
kissing the white wall
leaving a white (red) stain
and howling inarticulate
into “fabulous opera.”the “sweetie-pie” flaps
in the detritus (of literature)
like a disjointed secretary
on angeldust.
a deafening chorus
of CLUCKING is heard.MOON, SWANN, ANGELS,
ROSES – pulverized. ultimately
it doesn’t nausea because
i’m not nausea not a mother
self-effulgent of my own
misguided mother of intention.the writing falls apart (again…)
when the beautiful boy (me)
gazes into the water
and his phallus becomes
all of him, giant stalk
takes root blooms waxy
veins bursting out and then
there’s me! (again) bursting out and then
again bursting out! my head
the WRITING as two horned
phalluses.come, come, lunge
at my dungheap.
this is the summer of dissonant
content again, when
all education is
“special” and euphoric
(pulverize) natural (pulverize)
(pulverize)
(pulverize)